World Cup – Welcome Home!

9

1983 – We the last of the Generation X were born before India won its first cricket world cup and were too young to experience that victory. But we grew up hoping to experience it, not for a year or two but for 28 yrs. By this time my son is of the age I was during the first victory. Cricket to us is more than just sport, it is hope. It gives more hope than what any of the self motivation books or talks can provide, It gives more hope than real world success stories; coz in cricket you are not hearing a story, you are part of the game. Though not essentially playing it you participate in it making predictions, ball by ball. And like the stock market it is highly unpredictable, no matter how hard you try to do it and always end up missing some factor. No other game in history has the chances of victory less significant on capability of the players.  From the sun and rain gods, the chances of head or tail at the toss of a coin, geography of the venue, the crowd factor, several factors can play spoil sport. To win the game it is not just required to defeat the opponent but defeat nature itself. 600 balls of strategy by players on the field and off the field, every ball is a game by itself.

Cricket in India has grown along with us, along with our economy. During those times we were not yet there on the global stage. Cricket gave us hope that we could demonstrate ourselves equally on the global stage. Many of my friends would argue what cricket could do anything to India rather waste some productive hours. I would still argue that the ‘hope’ factor is more important to reach horizons, to challenge the impossible rather than just do hard work. That’s the game of cricket, you predict something and there would arise a player who would prove it all wrong, not just your predictions but nature and science itself. What else could give you more hope.

What could the statistics do to the victory of Srilanka. Right from the beginning the statistics decided Srilanka’s victory and at 31-2 how many could genuinely predict India’s victory. As if history did rewrite itself to challenge the capability of humans India won when it was least expected.

No other place in the world can you see the gods of India together, No other victory is celebrated so much. The cricketers, the politicians, the businessmen, the shining stars of Bollywood and a billion plus spectators; nothing would have seen the whole of India praying for a common goal, The victory of India. For there are no different religions, no different languages, it is a feeling that the whole nation has in common.

2011 – There was indeed one factor that predicted India’s win. The calendars of 1983 and 2011 were the same Smile. Against all odds India did win. To prove that we are very much in the global stage and give the next generation the hope to do more. Let this victory challenge all that’s been decided impossible in this country.

Share

Know Everything!

stock-vector-jack-king-queen-of-spades-vector-28951519When I was doing my undergraduate I was used to be regularly questioned by my friends on my interests in information technologies being a Chemical Engineer. I used to reply back stating that I am trying to find a link between the two. Though at that time my interests were not really based on what I claimed, I found my job requiring skills in both the areas and hence helping me perform better.

Today I find knowledge of ‘finance’, ‘history’, ‘psychology’ and ‘economics’ are essential to move up. Many technical people want to stay focused in their areas of interest which are mostly very narrow and expect to gain expertise in that field. But the whole idea can be challenged. Lack of knowledge in subject areas which seem totally unrelated can be a hurdle to professional growth even on technical areas of focus.

Knowledge of ‘history’ and ‘culture’ is very important to understand why your counterpart in an overseas affiliate behaves differently, knowledge of ‘finance’ is very essential to understand why and how top management decisions are made, knowing ‘psychology’ can help handle your sub ordinates better. Applying technical judgments in business world will fail miserably. Many technical people feel decisions are forced upon them because they fail to understand business needs and in a globalized environment they feel deserted when they fail to understand the history, culture and psychology of their colleagues.

Even technically many people want to ‘focus’ their expertise only on certain technical areas. Either they consider other areas not as challenging as their areas of expertise or they feel even their focus area is too much for their lifetime. And even to reason this behavior, knowledge of Indian culture and psychology is important. In Indian society ‘engineering’ enjoys higher status as compared to basic sciences, literature… And if you apply some ‘statistics’ you will find that this is purely linked to the higher average pay engineering graduates enjoy. Whether the JOBS really do any ‘engineering’ is a BIG QUESTION! I personally felt science more challenging and difficult than engineering. And today when I read the ‘history’ of ‘science’ itself it is difficult to make judgments on the validity of engineering we are doing now which are again based on science.

From childhood this idea has been drummed into us again and again: stay focused, jack of all trade makes king of none etc.. It might be true if our objectives are broader considering our lifespan on earth. Pathetically these objectives are too narrow or too ‘technical’ that it prevents achieve these objectives. Most of the seemingly unrelated subjects are highly correlated and technologies have very small lifespan. Hence to be successful it is essential to ‘KNOW EVRYTHING’

Note: The word ‘technical’ is not used with the right meaning in this blog. Even I was stamped non-technical by few people. To them technical is IT and rest of the world is non-technical 🙂

Share

The Power of ‘Charm’

“But charm is more valuable than beauty. You can resist beauty, but you can’t resist charm.” – Irene (Hors De Prix)

Very powerful is ‘charm’ that it tends to bias people against rational decisions. Throughout history men who were charming got more public recognition and rewards than men who really performed. And charm is not beauty, only charm can make popular a person as weird as Einstein. Though Niels Bohr had more results to his credit, he is no way near Einstein in popularity. Successes of many such people including Rajinikanth  (Tamil Actor) cannot be attributed to anything but charm.

This irrational bias can be attributed to the Theory of Thin Slices as explained by Malcolm Gladwell in his book ‘Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking’. In his book he claims most of the decisions taken by humans are in the time period of ‘Blink of an Eye’ without applying conscious judgment. This sort of decisions he claims tend to be more successful than conscious decisions except for cases where people fall to ‘charm’.

Though every human claims that at the conscious level they treat all equally, there exists an implicit bias that tend to provide unconscious favor to people who are more charming.

‘Charm’ provides an advantage in cases where decisions are to be made in short span of time. That is why the leaders who are selected to represent political parties for President or Prime Minister are the not the ones who are really capable political administrators. They are the ones who the people find ‘Charming’ enough to vote.

How many times we have heard of, seen to ourselves, people getting selected in interviews may not be as good as their competitors. I feel the ‘Charm’ effect provides this advantage. However the beneficiary has to be beware, while ‘Charm’ can help getting through and interview only performance in the long term will help sustainability.

‘Charm’ is definitely powerful.

Note: The Book ‘Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell’ does not make any references to ‘Charm’ and is not a reference to view points mentioned in this blog. The ideas mentioned in this blog are purely my views and inferences made from other sources such as this book. No proper research has been done by the author and no claim has been made for the correctness of views mentioned above.

Share

The Google Threat

image

If you have watched movies like Die Hard 4.0 or War Games you can potentially know how much can be done with information on centralized systems. Though the themes of these movies are fiction, reality is quite close or even worse.

Consider the amount of information Google has. They have an awful lot of data. They record everything. They have your IP address, your search requests, the contents of every e-mail you’ve ever sent or received. They know the news you read, the places you go.  They’re even collecting real-time GPS location and DNS look-ups. They cache web pages, have history of pages that don’t even exist currently. They know who you friends are, where you live, where you work, where you are spending your free time. They know about your health, your love life, your political leanings. ‘They even know what you are thinking about’ – quotes Marlinspike

While it is being claimed that IP addresses is kept for 18 months and anonymized immediately, privacy experts have alleged that even with anonymized user data, where bits of the IP address are changed or deleted, it is still relatively easy to correlate those addresses with user cookies to get a lock on a search engine query author’s identity.

I was myself surprised to see that Google web history not only records what I search but also what I browse. With it wide rage of services and rising popularity Google will be set to have more information about the whole world than sum of other organizations put together. While Google is an organization people trust, security of its systems especially from Chinese hackers is a big question?

Ref: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/google-even-knows-what-youre-thinking/6291

 

Share